Speech-trained and conversation-fine-tuned LLMs show small, inconsistent accuracy gains over text-only models on detecting covert deception, but the comparison is confounded.
Are Human Conversations Special? A Large Language Model Perspective
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
This study analyzes changes in the attention mechanisms of large language models (LLMs) when used to understand natural conversations between humans (human-human). We analyze three use cases of LLMs: interactions over web content, code, and mathematical texts. By analyzing attention distance, dispersion, and interdependency across these domains, we highlight the unique challenges posed by conversational data. Notably, conversations require nuanced handling of long-term contextual relationships and exhibit higher complexity through their attention patterns. Our findings reveal that while language models exhibit domain-specific attention behaviors, there is a significant gap in their ability to specialize in human conversations. Through detailed attention entropy analysis and t-SNE visualizations, we demonstrate the need for models trained with a diverse array of high-quality conversational data to enhance understanding and generation of human-like dialogue. This research highlights the importance of domain specialization in language models and suggests pathways for future advancement in modeling human conversational nuances.
fields
cs.CL 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
"Yeah Right!" -- Do LLMs Exhibit Multimodal Feature Transfer?
Speech-trained and conversation-fine-tuned LLMs show small, inconsistent accuracy gains over text-only models on detecting covert deception, but the comparison is confounded.