A systematic annotation of 94 AI alignment papers shows the field largely equates human values with measurable preferences, rarely defines values, and is increasingly removing humans from alignment evaluation.
and Boyd, Danah and Friedler, Sorelle A
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.AI 1years
2026 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Toward a Theory of Value in AI Alignment
A systematic annotation of 94 AI alignment papers shows the field largely equates human values with measurable preferences, rarely defines values, and is increasingly removing humans from alignment evaluation.