Pith. sign in

Fairness Through Regularization for Learning to Rank

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Given the abundance of applications of ranking in recent years, addressing fairness concerns around automated ranking systems becomes necessary for increasing the trust among end-users. Previous work on fair ranking has mostly focused on application-specific fairness notions, often tailored to online advertising, and it rarely considers learning as part of the process. In this work, we show how to transfer numerous fairness notions from binary classification to a learning to rank setting. Our formalism allows us to design methods for incorporating fairness objectives with provable generalization guarantees. An extensive experimental evaluation shows that our method can improve ranking fairness substantially with no or only little loss of model quality.

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

stat.ML 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

roles

background 1

polarities

unclear 1

representative citing papers

Overcoming Fairness Trade-offs via Pre-processing: A Causal Perspective

stat.ML · 2025-01-24 · conditional · novelty 5.0

Using the FiND world, a hypothetical fair world where protected attributes have no causal effect on the target, the authors show that fairness metrics become compatible and fairness aligns with accuracy, and that pre-processing methods can approximate this world in practice.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Overcoming Fairness Trade-offs via Pre-processing: A Causal Perspective stat.ML · 2025-01-24 · conditional · none · ref 36 · internal anchor

    Using the FiND world, a hypothetical fair world where protected attributes have no causal effect on the target, the authors show that fairness metrics become compatible and fairness aligns with accuracy, and that pre-processing methods can approximate this world in practice.