Edge-dropping methods like DropEdge reduce sensitivity between distant nodes in GNNs, harming long-range task performance, and a sensitivity-aware variant called DropSens partially restores it.
New Benchmarks for Learning on Non-Homophilous Graphs
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Much data with graph structures satisfy the principle of homophily, meaning that connected nodes tend to be similar with respect to a specific attribute. As such, ubiquitous datasets for graph machine learning tasks have generally been highly homophilous, rewarding methods that leverage homophily as an inductive bias. Recent work has pointed out this particular focus, as new non-homophilous datasets have been introduced and graph representation learning models better suited for low-homophily settings have been developed. However, these datasets are small and poorly suited to truly testing the effectiveness of new methods in non-homophilous settings. We present a series of improved graph datasets with node label relationships that do not satisfy the homophily principle. Along with this, we introduce a new measure of the presence or absence of homophily that is better suited than existing measures in different regimes. We benchmark a range of simple methods and graph neural networks across our proposed datasets, drawing new insights for further research. Data and codes can be found at https://github.com/CUAI/Non-Homophily-Benchmarks.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.LG 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Effects of Dropout on Performance in Long-range Graph Learning Tasks
Edge-dropping methods like DropEdge reduce sensitivity between distant nodes in GNNs, harming long-range task performance, and a sensitivity-aware variant called DropSens partially restores it.