pith. sign in

Comparing compact binary parameter distributions I: Methods

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Being able to measure each merger's sky location, distance, component masses, and conceivably spins, ground-based gravitational-wave detectors will provide a extensive and detailed sample of coalescing compact binaries (CCBs) in the local and, with third-generation detectors, distant universe. These measurements will distinguish between competing progenitor formation models. In this paper we develop practical tools to characterize the amount of experimentally accessible information available, to distinguish between two a priori progenitor models. Using a simple time-independent model, we demonstrate the information content scales strongly with the number of observations. The exact scaling depends on how significantly mass distributions change between similar models. We develop phenomenological diagnostics to estimate how many models can be distinguished, using first-generation and future instruments. Finally, we emphasize that multi-observable distributions can be fully exploited only with very precisely calibrated detectors, search pipelines, parameter estimation, and Bayesian model inference.

fields

astro-ph.HE 1

years

2026 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

representative citing papers

Population Properties of Binary Black Holes with Eccentricity

astro-ph.HE · 2026-02-11 · conditional · novelty 8.0

First joint population inference on binary black hole eccentricity from GWTC-4 bounds the eccentric branching ratio below 5% at 90% confidence, with results consistent with quasi-circular models but highly model-dependent.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Population Properties of Binary Black Holes with Eccentricity astro-ph.HE · 2026-02-11 · conditional · none · ref 26 · internal anchor

    First joint population inference on binary black hole eccentricity from GWTC-4 bounds the eccentric branching ratio below 5% at 90% confidence, with results consistent with quasi-circular models but highly model-dependent.