High-dimensional embeddings excel in few-shot regimes for some wireless tasks but carry high latency and parameter costs, whereas compressed autoencoder representations provide better noise robustness, stability, and efficiency.
Title resolution pending
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
eess.SP 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Benchmarking Wireless Representations: High-Dimensional vs. Compressed Embeddings for Efficiency and Robustness
High-dimensional embeddings excel in few-shot regimes for some wireless tasks but carry high latency and parameter costs, whereas compressed autoencoder representations provide better noise robustness, stability, and efficiency.