REFLECT benchmark shows current LLM judges achieve below 55% accuracy detecting failures in evidence-based research agents, especially on evidence verification.
ReportBench: Evaluating deep research agents via academic survey tasks
4 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
4
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 1
dataset 1
citation-polarity summary
years
2026 4verdicts
UNVERDICTED 4representative citing papers
Re²Math is a new benchmark that evaluates AI models on retrieving and verifying the applicability of theorems from math literature to advance steps in partial proofs, accepting any sufficient theorem while controlling for leakage.
Adversarial compromise of tool outputs misleads agentic AI via breadth and depth attacks, revealing that epistemic and navigational robustness are distinct and often trade off against each other.
The paper delivers a stage-by-stage roadmap for AI in research, showing reliable assistance in retrieval and tool tasks but fragility in novelty and judgment, advocating human-governed collaboration.
citing papers explorer
-
Time to REFLECT: Can We Trust LLM Judges for Evidence-based Research Agents?
REFLECT benchmark shows current LLM judges achieve below 55% accuracy detecting failures in evidence-based research agents, especially on evidence verification.
-
Re$^2$Math: Benchmarking Theorem Retrieval in Research-Level Mathematics
Re²Math is a new benchmark that evaluates AI models on retrieving and verifying the applicability of theorems from math literature to advance steps in partial proofs, accepting any sufficient theorem while controlling for leakage.
-
How Adversarial Environments Mislead Agentic AI?
Adversarial compromise of tool outputs misleads agentic AI via breadth and depth attacks, revealing that epistemic and navigational robustness are distinct and often trade off against each other.
-
AI for Auto-Research: Roadmap & User Guide
The paper delivers a stage-by-stage roadmap for AI in research, showing reliable assistance in retrieval and tool tasks but fragility in novelty and judgment, advocating human-governed collaboration.