Lemma 2 proves (1/n^{1/a_n}) sum Y_k -> 0, but the theorem needs (1/n) sum Y_k -> 0, and a counterexample shows the claimed SLLN fails.
Title resolution pending
1 Pith paper cite this work, alongside 1 external citations. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
1
external citations · OpenAlex
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
fields
math.PR 1years
2025 1verdicts
REJECT 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
On strong law of large numbers for non identically distributed random variables
Lemma 2 proves (1/n^{1/a_n}) sum Y_k -> 0, but the theorem needs (1/n) sum Y_k -> 0, and a counterexample shows the claimed SLLN fails.