Pith. sign in

AI Failures: A Review of Underlying Issues

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Instances of Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems failing to deliver consistent, satisfactory performance are legion. We investigate why AI failures occur. We address only a narrow subset of the broader field of AI Safety. We focus on AI failures on account of flaws in conceptualization, design and deployment. Other AI Safety issues like trade-offs between privacy and security or convenience, bad actors hacking into AI systems to create mayhem or bad actors deploying AI for purposes harmful to humanity and are out of scope of our discussion. We find that AI systems fail on account of omission and commission errors in the design of the AI system, as well as upon failure to develop an appropriate interpretation of input information. Moreover, even when there is no significant flaw in the AI software, an AI system may fail because the hardware is incapable of robust performance across environments. Finally an AI system is quite likely to fail in situations where, in effect, it is called upon to deliver moral judgments -- a capability AI does not possess. We observe certain trade-offs in measures to mitigate a subset of AI failures and provide some recommendations.

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.CY 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

roles

background 1

polarities

background 1

representative citing papers

Beyond Explainability: The Case for AI Validation

cs.CY · 2025-05-27 · conditional · novelty 4.0

AI governance should shift from explainability to validation as its central regulatory pillar, with a typology of valid-versus-explainable systems.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Beyond Explainability: The Case for AI Validation cs.CY · 2025-05-27 · conditional · none · ref 77 · internal anchor

    AI governance should shift from explainability to validation as its central regulatory pillar, with a typology of valid-versus-explainable systems.