ANANKE reports 97.1% TPR and 0.2% FPR for LLM-based attack investigation, but its central evaluation is compromised by knowledge-base overlap with test scenarios.
https://community.broadcom
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.CR 1years
2025 1verdicts
REJECT 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
An Automated Attack Investigation Approach Leveraging Threat-Knowledge-Augmented Large Language Models
ANANKE reports 97.1% TPR and 0.2% FPR for LLM-based attack investigation, but its central evaluation is compromised by knowledge-base overlap with test scenarios.