A position paper arguing that aleatoric/epistemic uncertainty splits fail for LLM agents and proposing underspecification, interaction, and output-based uncertainty research.
AmbigQA: Answering ambiguous open- domain questions
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.LG 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Position: Uncertainty Quantification Needs Reassessment for Large-language Model Agents
A position paper arguing that aleatoric/epistemic uncertainty splits fail for LLM agents and proposing underspecification, interaction, and output-based uncertainty research.