A pipeline extracts 1,416 human-annotated GPX tracks from Common Crawl to produce a multimodal geospatial dataset.
What’s in the box? a preliminary analysis of undesirable content in the common crawl corpus.arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.02732
4 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
fields
cs.CL 4representative citing papers
SharedLLM stacks two copies of a short-context LLM so the lower one compresses context into query-aware multi-grained tokens that are injected only at the lowest layers of the upper one, enabling generalization from 8K training to 128K+ inputs.
The authors provide a detailed taxonomy of 21 risks associated with language models, covering discrimination, information leaks, misinformation, malicious applications, interaction harms, and societal impacts like job loss and environmental costs.
Analysis estimates 18.7% of Common Crawl documents contain geospatial information like coordinates and addresses, with little difference by language.
citing papers explorer
-
CC-GPX: Extracting High-Quality Annotated Geospatial Data from Common Crawl
A pipeline extracts 1,416 human-annotated GPX tracks from Common Crawl to produce a multimodal geospatial dataset.
-
Stacked from One: Multi-Scale Self-Injection for Context Window Extension
SharedLLM stacks two copies of a short-context LLM so the lower one compresses context into query-aware multi-grained tokens that are injected only at the lowest layers of the upper one, enabling generalization from 8K training to 128K+ inputs.
-
Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Models
The authors provide a detailed taxonomy of 21 risks associated with language models, covering discrimination, information leaks, misinformation, malicious applications, interaction harms, and societal impacts like job loss and environmental costs.
-
Quantifying Geospatial in the Common Crawl Corpus
Analysis estimates 18.7% of Common Crawl documents contain geospatial information like coordinates and addresses, with little difference by language.