Pith. sign in

Semi-supervised Fine-tuning for Large Language Models

1 Pith paper cite this work, alongside 2 external citations. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
2 external citations · Pith
abstract

Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) is crucial in adapting large language model (LLMs) to a specific domain or task. However, only a limited amount of labeled data is available in practical applications, which poses a severe challenge for SFT in yielding satisfactory results. Therefore, a data-efficient framework that can fully exploit labeled and unlabeled data for LLM fine-tuning is highly anticipated.Towards this end, we introduce a semi-supervised fine-tuning(SemiFT) task and a framework named SemiEvol for LLM alignment from a propagate-and-select manner. For knowledge propagation, SemiEvol adopts a bi-level approach, propagating knowledge from labeled data to unlabeled data through both in-weight and in-context methods. For knowledge selection, SemiEvol incorporates a collaborative learning mechanism, selecting higher-quality pseudo-response samples. We conducted experiments using GPT-4o-mini and Llama-3.1 on seven general or domain-specific datasets, demonstrating significant improvements in model performance on target data. Furthermore, we compared SemiEvol with SFT and self-evolution methods, highlighting its practicality in hybrid data scenarios.

fields

eess.IV 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

representative citing papers

Learned iterative networks: An operator learning perspective

eess.IV · 2025-12-09 · conditional · novelty 3.0

Learned iterative reconstruction networks can be uniformly described as operator learning: the unrolled architecture fixes how to compute while the loss and data fix what to compute; for nonlinear inverse problems the update direction matters most.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Learned iterative networks: An operator learning perspective eess.IV · 2025-12-09 · conditional · none · ref 107 · internal anchor

    Learned iterative reconstruction networks can be uniformly described as operator learning: the unrolled architecture fixes how to compute while the loss and data fix what to compute; for nonlinear inverse problems the update direction matters most.