Pith. sign in

Don't Forget It! Conditional Sparse Autoencoder Clamping Works for Unlearning

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Recent developments in Large Language Model (LLM) capabilities have brought great potential but also posed new risks. For example, LLMs with knowledge of bioweapons, advanced chemistry, or cyberattacks could cause violence if placed in the wrong hands or during malfunctions. Because of their nature as near-black boxes, intuitive interpretation of LLM internals remains an open research question, preventing developers from easily controlling model behavior and capabilities. The use of Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) has recently emerged as a potential method of unraveling representations of concepts in LLMs internals, and has allowed developers to steer model outputs by directly modifying the hidden activations. In this paper, we use SAEs to identify unwanted concepts from the Weapons of Mass Destruction Proxy (WMDP) dataset within gemma-2-2b internals and use feature steering to reduce the model's ability to answer harmful questions while retaining its performance on harmless queries. Our results bring back optimism to the viability of SAE-based explicit knowledge unlearning techniques.

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.LG 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

roles

background 1

polarities

background 1

representative citing papers

SoK: Machine Unlearning for Large Language Models

cs.LG · 2025-06-10 · conditional · novelty 5.0

A new taxonomy for LLM unlearning distinguishes removal-intended from suppression-intended methods, and argues that gradient ascent methods functionally behave like suppression.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • SoK: Machine Unlearning for Large Language Models cs.LG · 2025-06-10 · conditional · none · ref 58 · internal anchor

    A new taxonomy for LLM unlearning distinguishes removal-intended from suppression-intended methods, and argues that gradient ascent methods functionally behave like suppression.