The paper's central result is an unsupported 88.83% accuracy claim from a Gaussian/dynamic texture model evaluated on the same dataset it was fit to.
Title resolution pending
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.CV 1years
2019 1verdicts
REJECT 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Machine and Deep Learning for Crowd Analytics
The paper's central result is an unsupported 88.83% accuracy claim from a Gaussian/dynamic texture model evaluated on the same dataset it was fit to.