Co-optimized planning of generation, storage, and transmission in a PJM model reduces estimated transmission upgrades by 67% and total system costs by 0.6% versus sequential planning.
Power systems expansion planning with time- varying co2 tax,
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
eess.SY 1years
2025 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Coordinated vs. Sequential Transmission Planning
Co-optimized planning of generation, storage, and transmission in a PJM model reduces estimated transmission upgrades by 67% and total system costs by 0.6% versus sequential planning.