Pith. sign in

Modified gravity with an exponential function of curvature

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

The role of an exponential function of the scalar curvature in the modified gravity is analyzed. Two models are proposed. A toy model that complies with local and cosmological constraints and gives appropriate qualitative description of the cosmic evolution. This model contains a saddle matter-dominant critical point that can evolve towards a late time de Sitter attractor. Initial conditions have been proposed, showing that this toy model has an acceptable matter era and gives an approximate qualitative behavior of cosmic evolution. A second viable model, behaves very close to $\Lambda$CDM at early times and can satisfy local and cosmological constraints. It behaves as $R-2\Lambda$ at $R\rightarrow \infty$ and tends to zero at $R\rightarrow 0$, containing flat spacetime solution. The model gives viable cosmological trajectories that, as the first model, connect the matter dominated point with a late time de Sitter attractor. The cosmic evolution of the main density parameters in this model is consistent with current observations with an equation of state very close to $-1$.

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

gr-qc 1

years

2024 1

verdicts

REJECT 1

roles

background 1

polarities

unclear 1

representative citing papers

Modified gravity/Dynamical Dark Energy vs $\Lambda$CDM: is the game over?

gr-qc · 2024-12-12 · reject · novelty 4.0

An AIC/χ² comparison of exponential F(R) gravity, wCDM, and CPL models against Pantheon+, DESI DR1, cosmic chronometer, and Planck-compressed data claims ΛCDM is excluded at 4σ, but the significance conversion is not statistically justified.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Modified gravity/Dynamical Dark Energy vs $\Lambda$CDM: is the game over? gr-qc · 2024-12-12 · reject · none · ref 32 · internal anchor

    An AIC/χ² comparison of exponential F(R) gravity, wCDM, and CPL models against Pantheon+, DESI DR1, cosmic chronometer, and Planck-compressed data claims ΛCDM is excluded at 4σ, but the significance conversion is not statistically justified.