A target-blind agent-generated test suite with a consensus-and-validator certification chain found 906 verified accepted-but-buggy submissions on AtCoder and led all baselines on post-cutoff Codeforces problems.
Can LLMs Generate High-Quality Test Cases for Algorithm Problems? TestCase-Eval: A Systematic Evaluation of Fault Coverage and Exposure
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
We introduce TestCase-Eval, a new benchmark for systematic evaluation of LLMs in test-case generation. TestCase-Eval includes 500 algorithm problems and 100,000 human-crafted solutions from the Codeforces platform. It focuses on two pivotal tasks: (1) Fault Coverage, which measures how well LLM-generated test sets probe diverse input scenarios and cover a wide range of potential failure modes. (2) Fault Exposure, which evaluates whether LLMs can craft a tailored test input that reveals a specific incorrect code implementation. We provide a comprehensive assessment of 19 state-of-the-art open-source and proprietary LLMs on TestCase-Eval, offering insights into their strengths and limitations in generating effective test cases for algorithm problems.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.SE 1years
2026 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Coding Agents as Test-Suite Auditors: Finding What Official Suites Miss While Approaching What They Catch
A target-blind agent-generated test suite with a consensus-and-validator certification chain found 906 verified accepted-but-buggy submissions on AtCoder and led all baselines on post-cutoff Codeforces problems.