Applying the MFFT active learning strategy to bioacoustic sound event detection reaches 68-71% mAP with 2.3% of labels, close to the 75% fully supervised baseline.
Towards Deep Active Learning in Avian Bioacoustics
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) in avian bioacoustics enables cost-effective and extensive data collection with minimal disruption to natural habitats. Despite advancements in computational avian bioacoustics, deep learning models continue to encounter challenges in adapting to diverse environments in practical PAM scenarios. This is primarily due to the scarcity of annotations, which requires labor-intensive efforts from human experts. Active learning (AL) reduces annotation cost and speed ups adaption to diverse scenarios by querying the most informative instances for labeling. This paper outlines a deep AL approach, introduces key challenges, and conducts a small-scale pilot study.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.SD 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Hybrid Disagreement-Diversity Active Learning for Bioacoustic Sound Event Detection
Applying the MFFT active learning strategy to bioacoustic sound event detection reaches 68-71% mAP with 2.3% of labels, close to the 75% fully supervised baseline.