Pith. sign in

The $abc$ conjecture is true almost always

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Let ${\rm rad}(n)$ denote the product of distinct prime factors of an integer $n\geq 1$. The celebrated $abc$ conjecture asks whether every solution to the equation $a+b=c$ in triples of coprime integers $(a,b,c)$ must satisfy ${\rm rad}(abc) > K_\varepsilon\, c^{1-\varepsilon}$, for some constant $K_\varepsilon>0$. In this expository note, we present a classical estimate of de Bruijn that implies almost all such triples satisfy the $abc$ conjecture, in a precise quantitative sense. Namely, there are at most $O(N^{2/3})$ many triples of coprime integers in a cube $(a,b,c)\in\{1,\ldots,N\}^3$ satisfying $a+b=c$ and ${\rm rad}(abc) < c^{1-\varepsilon}$. The proof is elementary and essentially self-contained. Beyond revisiting a classical argument for its own sake, this exposition is aimed to contextualize a new result of Browning, Lichtman, and Ter\"av\"ainen, who prove a refined estimate $O(N^{33/50})$, giving the first power-savings since 1962.

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

math.NT 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

REJECT 1

roles

background 1

polarities

background 1

representative citing papers

On the exceptional set in the $abc$ conjecture

math.NT · 2025-06-19 · reject · novelty 4.0

A new, slightly smaller exponent, 56/85, is claimed for the exceptional set of abc triples with c at most X, improving the previous 33/50.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • On the exceptional set in the $abc$ conjecture math.NT · 2025-06-19 · reject · none · ref 2 · internal anchor

    A new, slightly smaller exponent, 56/85, is claimed for the exceptional set of abc triples with c at most X, improving the previous 33/50.