A fixed learned sentence inserted into a frozen LLM's prompt steers its uncertainty so that lowest-entropy answer selection avoids misleading passages, raising mean F1 from 0.5148 to 0.5339 across five QA benchmarks.
GainRAG: Preference Alignment in Retrieval-Augmented Generation through Gain Signal Synthesis
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
The Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) framework introduces a retrieval module to dynamically inject retrieved information into the input context of large language models (LLMs), and has demonstrated significant success in various NLP tasks. However, the current study points out that there is a preference gap between retrievers and LLMs in the RAG framework, which limit the further improvement of system performance. Some highly relevant passages may interfere with LLM reasoning because they contain complex or contradictory information; while some indirectly related or even inaccurate content may help LLM generate more accurate answers by providing suggestive information or logical clues. To solve this, we propose GainRAG, a novel approach that aligns the retriever's and LLM's preferences by defining a new metric, "gain", which measure how well an input passage contributes to correct outputs. Specifically, we propose a method to estimate these gain signals and train a middleware that aligns the preferences of the retriever and the LLM using only limited data. In addition, we introduce a pseudo-passage strategy to mitigate degradation. The experimental results on 6 datasets verify the effectiveness of GainRAG.
fields
cs.CL 1years
2026 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
LODESTAR: Trustworthy Entropy Is Navigated, Not Merely Measured -- Reinforced Polarizer Keeps a Frozen LLM from Being Confidently Misled by the Wrong Evidence
A fixed learned sentence inserted into a frozen LLM's prompt steers its uncertainty so that lowest-entropy answer selection avoids misleading passages, raising mean F1 from 0.5148 to 0.5339 across five QA benchmarks.