Agentic safety fails to generalize across tasks because the task-to-safe-controller mapping has a higher Lipschitz constant than the task-to-controller mapping alone, as proven in linear-quadratic control and demonstrated in quadcopter and LLM experiments.
Sg-bench: Evaluating llm safety generalization across diverse tasks and prompt types.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:123032–123054
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
years
2026 2roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
LLMs for robotic health attendant control violate safety rules in 54.4% of harmful scenarios on average, with proprietary models at 23.7% median violation versus 72.8% for open-weight models, indicating they are not yet safe for clinical use.
citing papers explorer
-
Why Does Agentic Safety Fail to Generalize Across Tasks?
Agentic safety fails to generalize across tasks because the task-to-safe-controller mapping has a higher Lipschitz constant than the task-to-controller mapping alone, as proven in linear-quadratic control and demonstrated in quadcopter and LLM experiments.
-
Benchmarking the Safety of Large Language Models for Robotic Health Attendant Control
LLMs for robotic health attendant control violate safety rules in 54.4% of harmful scenarios on average, with proprietary models at 23.7% median violation versus 72.8% for open-weight models, indicating they are not yet safe for clinical use.