The paper compares U.S. and Chinese governance of general-purpose AI and identifies three divergences: focus of domestic regulation, key principles, and international forum choices.
As of November 25, 2024: https://idais.ai/ International Dialogues on AI Safety, statement at IDAIS-Beijing 2024, March 10–11,
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.CY 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Bridging the Artificial Intelligence Governance Gap: The United States' and China's Divergent Approaches to Governing General-Purpose Artificial Intelligence
The paper compares U.S. and Chinese governance of general-purpose AI and identifies three divergences: focus of domestic regulation, key principles, and international forum choices.