Sequence transformations applied to the fixed-order QCD series for hadronic tau decays produce estimates c5,1 = 298 ± 15, c6,1 = 3431 ± 256, c7,1 = 2.29 ± 0.29 × 10^4 and a predicted δ^(0)_FOPT = 0.2119 ± 0.0040.
A new determination of \alpha_s from hadronic \tau\ decays
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
abstract
We present a new framework for the extraction of the strong coupling from hadronic \tau decays through finite-energy sum rules. Our focus is on the small, but still significant non-perturbative effects that, in principle, affect both the central value and the systematic error. We employ a quantitative model in order to accommodate violations of quark-hadron duality, and enforce a consistent treatment of the higher-dimensional contributions of the Operator Product Expansion to our sum rules. Using 1998 OPAL data for the non-strange isovector vector and axial-vector spectral functions, we find the n_f=3 values \alpha_s(m_\tau^2)=0.307+-0.019 in fixed-order perturbation theory, and 0.322+-0.026 in contour-improved perturbation theory. For comparison, the original OPAL analysis of the same data led to the values 0.324+-0.014 (fixed-order) and 0.348+-0.021 (contour-improved).
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
fields
hep-ph 2years
2026 2verdicts
UNVERDICTED 2roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
Lattice QCD and tau-decay dispersive calculations of isospin-one HVP generally agree, except for a significant difference in the 2π−π+π0 four-pion mode contribution to window quantities.
citing papers explorer
-
Hadronic tau decays at higher orders in QCD
Sequence transformations applied to the fixed-order QCD series for hadronic tau decays produce estimates c5,1 = 298 ± 15, c6,1 = 3431 ± 256, c7,1 = 2.29 ± 0.29 × 10^4 and a predicted δ^(0)_FOPT = 0.2119 ± 0.0040.
-
Comparison of the hadronic vacuum polarization between hadronic $\tau$-decay data and lattice QCD
Lattice QCD and tau-decay dispersive calculations of isospin-one HVP generally agree, except for a significant difference in the 2π−π+π0 four-pion mode contribution to window quantities.