Interviews were the most time-efficient elicitation method for explainability needs, surveys yielded the largest volume with high redundancy, and introducing an explanation-need taxonomy only after free elicitation produced more and more diverse needs.
A Methodology for the Selection of Requirement Elicitation Techniques
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
In this paper, we present an approach to select a subset of requirement elicitation technique for an optimum result in the requirement elicitation process. Our approach consists of three steps. First, we identify various attribute in three important dimensions namely project, people and the process of software development that can influence the outcome of an elicitation process. Second, we construct three p matrix (3PM) separately for each dimension, that shows a relation between the elicitation techniques and three dimensions of a software. Third, we provide a mapping criteria and use them in the selection of a subset of elicitation techniques. We demonstrate the applicability of the proposed approach using case studies to evaluate and provide the contextual knowledge of selecting requirement elicitation technique.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.SE 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
support 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
How to Elicit Explainability Requirements? A Comparison of Interviews, Focus Groups, and Surveys
Interviews were the most time-efficient elicitation method for explainability needs, surveys yielded the largest volume with high redundancy, and introducing an explanation-need taxonomy only after free elicitation produced more and more diverse needs.