Pith. sign in

Near-Optimal Bounds for Testing Histogram Distributions

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

We investigate the problem of testing whether a discrete probability distribution over an ordered domain is a histogram on a specified number of bins. One of the most common tools for the succinct approximation of data, $k$-histograms over $[n]$, are probability distributions that are piecewise constant over a set of $k$ intervals. The histogram testing problem is the following: Given samples from an unknown distribution $\mathbf{p}$ on $[n]$, we want to distinguish between the cases that $\mathbf{p}$ is a $k$-histogram versus $\varepsilon$-far from any $k$-histogram, in total variation distance. Our main result is a sample near-optimal and computationally efficient algorithm for this testing problem, and a nearly-matching (within logarithmic factors) sample complexity lower bound. Specifically, we show that the histogram testing problem has sample complexity $\widetilde \Theta (\sqrt{nk} / \varepsilon + k / \varepsilon^2 + \sqrt{n} / \varepsilon^2)$.

fields

cs.LG 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

representative citing papers

Replicable Distribution Testing

cs.LG · 2025-07-03 · conditional · novelty 8.0

A new random-walk framework yields near-optimal sample complexity bounds for replicable uniformity testing (settling an open question) and for replicable closeness testing.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Replicable Distribution Testing cs.LG · 2025-07-03 · conditional · none · ref 17 · internal anchor

    A new random-walk framework yields near-optimal sample complexity bounds for replicable uniformity testing (settling an open question) and for replicable closeness testing.