Across heavy NP shift, dative alternation and multiple PP shift, LLM ordering preferences correlate with human judgments, but particle movement preferences do not.
Assessing the Ability of LSTMs to Learn Syntax-Sensitive Dependencies
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
The success of long short-term memory (LSTM) neural networks in language processing is typically attributed to their ability to capture long-distance statistical regularities. Linguistic regularities are often sensitive to syntactic structure; can such dependencies be captured by LSTMs, which do not have explicit structural representations? We begin addressing this question using number agreement in English subject-verb dependencies. We probe the architecture's grammatical competence both using training objectives with an explicit grammatical target (number prediction, grammaticality judgments) and using language models. In the strongly supervised settings, the LSTM achieved very high overall accuracy (less than 1% errors), but errors increased when sequential and structural information conflicted. The frequency of such errors rose sharply in the language-modeling setting. We conclude that LSTMs can capture a non-trivial amount of grammatical structure given targeted supervision, but stronger architectures may be required to further reduce errors; furthermore, the language modeling signal is insufficient for capturing syntax-sensitive dependencies, and should be supplemented with more direct supervision if such dependencies need to be captured.
fields
cs.CL 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Language Models Largely Exhibit Human-like Constituent Ordering Preferences
Across heavy NP shift, dative alternation and multiple PP shift, LLM ordering preferences correlate with human judgments, but particle movement preferences do not.