A formalized Minimal Cognitive Grid ranks computational models of analogy and metaphor by alignment with cognitive theories using Functional/Structural Ratio, Generality, and Performance Match dimensions.
Title resolution pending
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
3
Pith papers citing it
verdicts
UNVERDICTED 3representative citing papers
The paper claims that mechanistic interpretability needs philosophy as a partner to clarify concepts, refine methods, and navigate epistemic and ethical complexities in AI systems.
Position paper claims multimodal LLMs can significantly advance scientific reasoning and proposes a four-stage roadmap plus challenges and suggestions.
citing papers explorer
-
Structural Ranking of the Cognitive Plausibility of Computational Models of Analogy and Metaphors with the Minimal Cognitive Grid
A formalized Minimal Cognitive Grid ranks computational models of analogy and metaphor by alignment with cognitive theories using Functional/Structural Ratio, Generality, and Performance Match dimensions.
-
Mechanistic Interpretability Needs Philosophy
The paper claims that mechanistic interpretability needs philosophy as a partner to clarify concepts, refine methods, and navigate epistemic and ethical complexities in AI systems.
-
Position: Multimodal Large Language Models Can Significantly Advance Scientific Reasoning
Position paper claims multimodal LLMs can significantly advance scientific reasoning and proposes a four-stage roadmap plus challenges and suggestions.