Pith. sign in

Tree Splitting Based Rounding Scheme for Weighted Proportional Allocations with Subsidy

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

We consider the problem of allocating $m$ indivisible items to a set of $n$ heterogeneous agents, aiming at computing a proportional allocation by introducing subsidy (money). It has been shown by Wu et al. (WINE 2023) that when agents are unweighted a total subsidy of $n/4$ suffices (assuming that each item has value/cost at most $1$ to every agent) to ensure proportionality. When agents have general weights, they proposed an algorithm that guarantees a weighted proportional allocation requiring a total subsidy of $(n-1)/2$, by rounding the fractional bid-and-take algorithm. In this work, we revisit the problem and the fractional bid-and-take algorithm. We show that by formulating the fractional allocation returned by the algorithm as a directed tree connecting the agents and splitting the tree into canonical components, there is a rounding scheme that requires a total subsidy of at most $n/3 - 1/6$.

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.GT 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

roles

background 1

polarities

background 1

representative citing papers

Achieving Equitability with Subsidy

cs.GT · 2025-05-29 · conditional · novelty 7.0

The authors derive near-tight subsidy bounds for equitable allocations, characterize allocations that achieve both equitability and envy-freeness with the same payments, and provide approximation algorithms for welfare guarantees.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Achieving Equitability with Subsidy cs.GT · 2025-05-29 · conditional · none · ref 28 · internal anchor

    The authors derive near-tight subsidy bounds for equitable allocations, characterize allocations that achieve both equitability and envy-freeness with the same payments, and provide approximation algorithms for welfare guarantees.