An external policy-enforcement layer with a trust score claims to block risky AI-agent actions in simulations, but its core formula is inconsistent across the paper.
Enforcement Agents: Enhancing Accountability and Resilience in Multi-Agent AI Frameworks
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
As autonomous agents become more powerful and widely used, it is becoming increasingly important to ensure they behave safely and stay aligned with system goals, especially in multi-agent settings. Current systems often rely on agents self-monitoring or correcting issues after the fact, but they lack mechanisms for real-time oversight. This paper introduces the Enforcement Agent (EA) Framework, which embeds dedicated supervisory agents into the environment to monitor others, detect misbehavior, and intervene through real-time correction. We implement this framework in a custom drone simulation and evaluate it across 90 episodes using 0, 1, and 2 EA configurations. Results show that adding EAs significantly improves system safety: success rates rise from 0.0% with no EA to 7.4% with one EA and 26.7% with two EAs. The system also demonstrates increased operational longevity and higher rates of malicious drone reformation. These findings highlight the potential of lightweight, real-time supervision for enhancing alignment and resilience in multi-agent systems.
fields
cs.LG 1years
2025 1verdicts
REJECT 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Governance-as-a-Service: A Multi-Agent Framework for AI System Compliance and Policy Enforcement
An external policy-enforcement layer with a trust score claims to block risky AI-agent actions in simulations, but its core formula is inconsistent across the paper.