Believed human feedback boosts time on task in coding tutorials compared to AI feedback with matched timing, but disbelief in human attribution leads to poorer outcomes than transparent AI feedback.
Title resolution pending
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
citation-role summary
method 1
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.HC 1years
2026 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
method 1polarities
use method 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Same Feedback, Different Source: How AI vs. Human Feedback Attribution and Credibility Shape Learner Behavior in Computing Education
Believed human feedback boosts time on task in coding tutorials compared to AI feedback with matched timing, but disbelief in human attribution leads to poorer outcomes than transparent AI feedback.