Pith. sign in

The edge-statistics conjecture for hypergraphs

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Let $r,k,\ell$ be integers such that $0\le\ell\le\binom{k}{r}$. Given a large $r$-uniform hypergraph $G$, we consider the fraction of $k$-vertex subsets which span exactly $\ell$ edges. If $\ell$ is 0 or $\binom{k}{r}$, this fraction can be exactly 1 (by taking $G$ to be empty or complete), but for all other values of $\ell$, one might suspect that this fraction is always significantly smaller than 1. In this paper we prove an essentially optimal result along these lines: if $\ell$ is not 0 or $\binom{k}{r}$, then this fraction is at most $(1/e) + \varepsilon$, assuming $k$ is sufficiently large in terms of $r$ and $\varepsilon>0$, and $G$ is sufficiently large in terms of $k$. Previously, this was only known for a very limited range of values of $r,k,\ell$ (due to Kwan-Sudakov-Tran, Fox-Sauermann, and Martinsson-Mousset-Noever-Truji\'{c}). Our result answers a question of Alon-Hefetz-Krivelevich-Tyomkyn, who suggested this as a hypergraph generalisation of their "edge-statistics conjecture". We also prove a much stronger bound when $\ell$ is far from 0 and $\binom{k}{r}$.

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

math.CO 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

roles

background 1

polarities

background 1

representative citing papers

Relative discrepancy of hypergraphs

math.CO · 2025-06-29 · conditional · novelty 8.0

The paper proves bs(k) ≤ g(k)+2 for k-uniform hypergraphs, determines bs(k)=3 for 3≤k≤13, and improves the known upper bound from k+1 to O(k^{0.525}).

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Relative discrepancy of hypergraphs math.CO · 2025-06-29 · conditional · none · ref 18 · internal anchor

    The paper proves bs(k) ≤ g(k)+2 for k-uniform hypergraphs, determines bs(k)=3 for 3≤k≤13, and improves the known upper bound from k+1 to O(k^{0.525}).