pith. sign in

(35) Observation (16a) implies ⟨P 1 CA2(B2 − B1)⟩ = 0 ⇒ P 1 CX ′ A |ψ ⟩ ⊥ P 0 CZ ′ B |ψ ⟩ (36) and combine the first relation in ( 34), we have P 1 CX ′ A |ψ ⟩ ⊥ P 1 CZ ′ A |ψ ⟩

implies P 1 CZ ′ A |ψ ⟩ =P 1 CZ ′ B |ψ ⟩, P 1 CX ′ A |ψ ⟩ =P 1 CX ′ B |ψ ⟩ (34), the anti-commutation relations P 1 CZ ′ AX ′ A |ψ ⟩ = −P 1 CX ′ AZ ′ A |ψ ⟩, P 1 CZ ′ BX ′ B |ψ

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
browse 1 citing papers

fields

quant-ph 1

years

2019 1

verdicts

UNVERDICTED 1

representative citing papers

Self-testing of symmetric three-qubit states

quant-ph · 2019-07-15 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Analytical self-testing criterion proven for equal-coefficient symmetric three-qubit state; general family shown numerically self-testable via swap method and SDP.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Self-testing of symmetric three-qubit states quant-ph · 2019-07-15 · unverdicted · none · ref 2

    Analytical self-testing criterion proven for equal-coefficient symmetric three-qubit state; general family shown numerically self-testable via swap method and SDP.