A structured literature survey of safety mechanisms in long-horizon robotic manipulation organized by intervention timing and strength of supporting evidence.
Flow Matching with Uncertainty Quantification and Guidance
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Despite the remarkable success of sampling-based generative models such as flow matching, they can still produce samples of inconsistent or degraded quality. To assess sample reliability and generate higher-quality outputs, we propose uncertainty-aware flow matching (UA-Flow), a lightweight extension of flow matching that predicts the velocity field together with heteroscedastic uncertainty. UA-Flow estimates per-sample uncertainty by propagating velocity uncertainty through the flow dynamics. These uncertainty estimates act as a reliability signal for individual samples, and we further use them to steer generation via uncertainty-aware classifier guidance and classifier-free guidance. Experiments on image generation show that UA-Flow produces uncertainty signals more highly correlated with sample fidelity than baseline methods, and that uncertainty-guided sampling further improves generation quality.
years
2026 2representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Safe Embodied AI for Long-horizon Tasks: A Cross-layer Analysis of Robotic Manipulation
A structured literature survey of safety mechanisms in long-horizon robotic manipulation organized by intervention timing and strength of supporting evidence.
- Uncertainty in a Single Pass: A Closed-Form Identity for One-Step Flow Matching