Cross-cultural survey of 4,641 participants shows LLM emotional support adoption varies widely by country and demographics, with socioeconomic status as strongest predictor of trust and use, and English-speaking nations more accepting than others in Europe.
Computer says ``No'': The Case Against Empathetic Conversational AI
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
years
2026 2verdicts
UNVERDICTED 2representative citing papers
Proposes affective safety as a distinct class of AI harms with a taxonomy of self-alienation, bias, and relational harms, arguing that existing safety frameworks address it narrowly or not at all and calling for dedicated approaches focused on cumulative and identity-level effects.
citing papers explorer
-
From Chatbots to Confidants: A Cross-Cultural Study of LLM Adoption for Emotional Support
Cross-cultural survey of 4,641 participants shows LLM emotional support adoption varies widely by country and demographics, with socioeconomic status as strongest predictor of trust and use, and English-speaking nations more accepting than others in Europe.
-
Affective AI Safety: The Missing Piece in LLM Safety
Proposes affective safety as a distinct class of AI harms with a taxonomy of self-alienation, bias, and relational harms, arguing that existing safety frameworks address it narrowly or not at all and calling for dedicated approaches focused on cumulative and identity-level effects.