ViStruct automatically breaks visualization questions into ordered subtasks tied to highlighted chart regions, imitating expert analysis strategies for chart reading.
Unraveling the Truth: Do VLMs really Understand Charts? A Deep Dive into Consistency and Robustness
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Chart question answering (CQA) is a crucial area of Visual Language Understanding. However, the robustness and consistency of current Visual Language Models (VLMs) in this field remain under-explored. This paper evaluates state-of-the-art VLMs on comprehensive datasets, developed specifically for this study, encompassing diverse question categories and chart formats. We investigate two key aspects: 1) the models' ability to handle varying levels of chart and question complexity, and 2) their robustness across different visual representations of the same underlying data. Our analysis reveals significant performance variations based on question and chart types, highlighting both strengths and weaknesses of current models. Additionally, we identify areas for improvement and propose future research directions to build more robust and reliable CQA systems. This study sheds light on the limitations of current models and paves the way for future advancements in the field.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.HC 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
ViStruct: Simulating Expert-Like Reasoning Through Task Decomposition and Visual Attention Cues
ViStruct automatically breaks visualization questions into ordered subtasks tied to highlighted chart regions, imitating expert analysis strategies for chart reading.