pith. sign in

and Steinke, T

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

The simplest and most widely applied method for guaranteeing differential privacy is to add instance-independent noise to a statistic of interest that is scaled to its global sensitivity. However, global sensitivity is a worst-case notion that is often too conservative for realized dataset instances. We provide methods for scaling noise in an instance-dependent way and demonstrate that they provide greater accuracy under average-case distributional assumptions. Specifically, we consider the basic problem of privately estimating the mean of a real distribution from i.i.d.~samples. The standard empirical mean estimator can have arbitrarily-high global sensitivity. We propose the trimmed mean estimator, which interpolates between the mean and the median, as a way of attaining much lower sensitivity on average while losing very little in terms of statistical accuracy. To privately estimate the trimmed mean, we revisit the smooth sensitivity framework of Nissim, Raskhodnikova, and Smith (STOC 2007), which provides a framework for using instance-dependent sensitivity. We propose three new additive noise distributions which provide concentrated differential privacy when scaled to smooth sensitivity. We provide theoretical and experimental evidence showing that our noise distributions compare favorably to others in the literature, in particular, when applied to the mean estimation problem.

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.LG 1

years

2026 1

verdicts

ACCEPT 1

roles

background 1

polarities

background 1

representative citing papers

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • DPrivBench: Benchmarking LLMs' Reasoning for Differential Privacy cs.LG · 2026-04-17 · accept · none · ref 5 · 2 links · internal anchor

    DPrivBench is a new benchmark for evaluating LLMs on differential privacy reasoning, with results showing good performance on textbook mechanisms but substantial failures on advanced algorithms.