A robust DID estimator recovers path-dependent treatment effects with partially missing treatment histories whenever any two of outcome, propensity, and missingness models are correct.
What Do We Get from Two-Way Fixed Effects Regressions? Implications from Numerical Equivalence
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
This paper develops numerical and causal interpretations of two-way fixed effects (TWFE) regressions in settings with nonbinary, nonstaggered treatments and time-varying covariates. Using the equivalence between TWFE and pooled first-difference (FD) regressions, I express the TWFE coefficient as a weighted average of FD coefficients across all horizons, clarifying how short- and long-run changes contribute to the estimate. Causal interpretation of the TWFE coefficient relies on common trends assumptions at all horizons simultaneously, whereas each FD coefficient relies on the assumption only at its own horizon. This structure opens the identifying assumptions to empirical scrutiny: I propose diagnostic procedures that assess common trends horizon by horizon, and illustrate them by reexamining TWFE estimates of minimum-wage effects on employment.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
econ.EM 1years
2025 1verdicts
ACCEPT 1roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Identification of dynamic treatment effects when treatment histories are partially observed
A robust DID estimator recovers path-dependent treatment effects with partially missing treatment histories whenever any two of outcome, propensity, and missingness models are correct.