A randomized execution study with 43 experts shows that LLM-generated research ideas lose more of their appeal than human ideas when actually implemented, reversing part of their ideation-stage advantage.
PolyPrompt: Automating Knowledge Extraction from Multilingual Language Models with Dynamic Prompt Generation
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Large language models (LLMs) showcase increasingly impressive English benchmark scores, however their performance profiles remain inconsistent across multilingual settings. To address this gap, we introduce PolyPrompt, a novel, parameter-efficient framework for enhancing the multilingual capabilities of LLMs. Our method learns a set of trigger tokens for each language through a gradient-based search, identifying the input query's language and selecting the corresponding trigger tokens which are prepended to the prompt during inference. We perform experiments on two ~1 billion parameter models, with evaluations on the global MMLU benchmark across fifteen typologically and resource diverse languages, demonstrating accuracy gains of 3.7%-19.9% compared to naive and translation-pipeline baselines.
fields
cs.CL 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
The Ideation-Execution Gap: Execution Outcomes of LLM-Generated versus Human Research Ideas
A randomized execution study with 43 experts shows that LLM-generated research ideas lose more of their appeal than human ideas when actually implemented, reversing part of their ideation-stage advantage.