Chaplains view AI chatbots as unable to provide attuned pastoral care for non-clinical emotional needs, based on themes of listening, connecting, carrying, and wanting.
I Hear You, I Feel You
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
3
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.HC 3verdicts
UNVERDICTED 3roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
A taxonomy and design space for chart annotations synthesized from qualitative coding of 1,800 static real-world examples.
A voice-based AI conversational agent for serious illness conversations in the ED was feasible and acceptable to most of 55 patients, with comparable feeling-heard ratings to clinicians but with risks of hallucinated diagnostic statements.
citing papers explorer
-
Chaplains' Reflections on the Design and Usage of AI for Conversational Care
Chaplains view AI chatbots as unable to provide attuned pastoral care for non-clinical emotional needs, based on themes of listening, connecting, carrying, and wanting.
-
A Qualitative Analysis of Common Practices in Annotations: A Taxonomy and Design Space
A taxonomy and design space for chart annotations synthesized from qualitative coding of 1,800 static real-world examples.
-
Exploring the Feasibility and Acceptability of AI-Mediated Serious Illness Conversations in the Emergency Department
A voice-based AI conversational agent for serious illness conversations in the ED was feasible and acceptable to most of 55 patients, with comparable feeling-heard ratings to clinicians but with risks of hallucinated diagnostic statements.