Review classifying classical and quantum factoring and primality testing algorithms with performance comparisons, concluding Shor's algorithm advances factoring but quantum primality testing shows no comparable gains.
Four primality testing algorithms
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
In this expository paper we describe four primality tests. The first test is very efficient, but is only capable of proving that a given number is either composite or 'very probably' prime. The second test is a deterministic polynomial time algorithm to prove that a given numer is either prime or composite. The third and fourth primality tests are at present most widely used in practice. Both tests are capable of proving that a given number is prime or composite, but neither algorithm is deterministic. The third algorithm exploits the arithmetic of cyclotomic fields. Its running time is almost, but not quite polynomial time. The fourth algorithm exploits elliptic curves. Its running time is difficult to estimate, but it behaves well in practice.
fields
cs.CR 1years
2020 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Advances in Factoring and Primality Testing: From Classical to Quantum Algorithms
Review classifying classical and quantum factoring and primality testing algorithms with performance comparisons, concluding Shor's algorithm advances factoring but quantum primality testing shows no comparable gains.