ChatGPT responses to visualization design questions were rated higher than forum-user responses, mainly due to broader coverage and task-focused structure, with GPT-4 showing a hybrid of human and GPT-3.5 styles.
How Good is ChatGPT in Giving Advice on Your Visualization Design?
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Data visualization creators often lack formal training, resulting in a knowledge gap in design practice. Large language models such as ChatGPT, with their vast internet-scale training data, offer transformative potential to address this gap. In this study, we used both qualitative and quantitative methods to investigate how well ChatGPT can address visualization design questions. First, we quantitatively compared the ChatGPT-generated responses with anonymous online Human replies to data visualization questions on the VisGuides user forum. Next, we conducted a qualitative user study examining the reactions and attitudes of practitioners toward ChatGPT as a visualization design assistant. Participants were asked to bring their visualizations and design questions and received feedback from both Human experts and ChatGPT in randomized order. Our findings from both studies underscore ChatGPT's strengths, particularly its ability to rapidly generate diverse design options, while also highlighting areas for improvement, such as nuanced contextual understanding and fluid interaction dynamics beyond the chat interface. Drawing on these insights, we discuss design considerations for future LLM-based design feedback systems.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.HC 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
baseline 1polarities
baseline 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Understanding Why ChatGPT Outperforms Humans in Visualization Design Advice
ChatGPT responses to visualization design questions were rated higher than forum-user responses, mainly due to broader coverage and task-focused structure, with GPT-4 showing a hybrid of human and GPT-3.5 styles.