GPT-4o increases emotional lexicon and uses more questions and exclamations when asked to strengthen speeches, but follows a surface style rather than human-like persuasive argumentation.
LLM Cognitive Judgements Differ From Human
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have lately been on the spotlight of researchers, businesses, and consumers alike. While the linguistic capabilities of such models have been studied extensively, there is growing interest in investigating them as cognitive subjects. In the present work I examine GPT-3 and ChatGPT capabilities on an limited-data inductive reasoning task from the cognitive science literature. The results suggest that these models' cognitive judgements are not human-like.
fields
cs.CL 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
The Anatomy of Speech Persuasion: Linguistic Shifts in LLM-Modified Speeches
GPT-4o increases emotional lexicon and uses more questions and exclamations when asked to strengthen speeches, but follows a surface style rather than human-like persuasive argumentation.