DP-SGD causes large utility loss in deep trajectory generation, a new DP mechanism for conditional inputs helps stabilize GANs, and GANs overtake diffusion models when formal privacy is required.
On the regularization of Wasserstein GANs
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Since their invention, generative adversarial networks (GANs) have become a popular approach for learning to model a distribution of real (unlabeled) data. Convergence problems during training are overcome by Wasserstein GANs which minimize the distance between the model and the empirical distribution in terms of a different metric, but thereby introduce a Lipschitz constraint into the optimization problem. A simple way to enforce the Lipschitz constraint on the class of functions, which can be modeled by the neural network, is weight clipping. It was proposed that training can be improved by instead augmenting the loss by a regularization term that penalizes the deviation of the gradient of the critic (as a function of the network's input) from one. We present theoretical arguments why using a weaker regularization term enforcing the Lipschitz constraint is preferable. These arguments are supported by experimental results on toy data sets.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.CR 1years
2025 1verdicts
REJECT 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
What is the Cost of Differential Privacy for Deep Learning-Based Trajectory Generation?
DP-SGD causes large utility loss in deep trajectory generation, a new DP mechanism for conditional inputs helps stabilize GANs, and GANs overtake diffusion models when formal privacy is required.