A new micro-edit dataset and fine-tuning recipe appear to help multimodal LLMs notice small visual changes, but the central 'feature consistency loss' claim is not present in the method.
TLDR: Token-Level Detective Reward Model for Large Vision Language Models
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Although reward models have been successful in improving multimodal large language models, the reward models themselves remain brutal and contain minimal information. Notably, existing reward models only mimic human annotations by assigning only one binary feedback to any text, no matter how long the text is. In the realm of multimodal language models, where models are required to process both images and texts, a naive reward model may learn implicit biases toward texts and become less grounded in images. In this paper, we propose a $\textbf{T}$oken-$\textbf{L}$evel $\textbf{D}$etective $\textbf{R}$eward Model ($\textbf{TLDR}$) to provide fine-grained annotations to each text token. We first introduce a perturbation-based method to generate synthetic hard negatives and their token-level labels to train TLDR models. Then we show the rich usefulness of TLDR models both in assisting off-the-shelf models to self-correct their generations, and in serving as a hallucination evaluation tool. We show that TLDR automatically trains a token-level likelihood optimization, and can improve the base model's performance significantly. Finally, we show that TLDR models can significantly speed up human annotation by 3 times to acquire a broader range of high-quality vision language data.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.CV 1years
2025 1verdicts
REJECT 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Hallucination at a Glance: Controlled Visual Edits and Fine-Grained Multimodal Learning
A new micro-edit dataset and fine-tuning recipe appear to help multimodal LLMs notice small visual changes, but the central 'feature consistency loss' claim is not present in the method.