Interviews with 17 data experts show skepticism toward differentially private synthetic data, a last-resort stance, and a demand for validation against real data.
Really Useful Synthetic Data -- A Framework to Evaluate the Quality of Differentially Private Synthetic Data
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Recent advances in generating synthetic data that allow to add principled ways of protecting privacy -- such as Differential Privacy -- are a crucial step in sharing statistical information in a privacy preserving way. But while the focus has been on privacy guarantees, the resulting private synthetic data is only useful if it still carries statistical information from the original data. To further optimise the inherent trade-off between data privacy and data quality, it is necessary to think closely about the latter. What is it that data analysts want? Acknowledging that data quality is a subjective concept, we develop a framework to evaluate the quality of differentially private synthetic data from an applied researcher's perspective. Data quality can be measured along two dimensions. First, quality of synthetic data can be evaluated against training data or against an underlying population. Second, the quality of synthetic data depends on general similarity of distributions or specific tasks such as inference or prediction. It is clear that accommodating all goals at once is a formidable challenge. We invite the academic community to jointly advance the privacy-quality frontier.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.HC 1years
2024 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Are Data Experts Buying into Differentially Private Synthetic Data? Gathering Community Perspectives
Interviews with 17 data experts show skepticism toward differentially private synthetic data, a last-resort stance, and a demand for validation against real data.