SModelS v3.0 largely reproduces ATLAS pMSSM electroweak-ino constraints, with CMS inclusion and combinations tightening limits but leaving some light ino parameter space viable.
On the coverage of the pMSSM by simplified model results
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
We investigate to which extent the SUSY search results published by ATLAS and CMS in the context of simplified models actually cover the more realistic scenarios of a full model. Concretely, we work within the phenomenological MSSM (pMSSM) with 19 free parameters and compare the constraints obtained from SModelSv1.1.1 with those from the ATLAS pMSSM study in arXiv:1508.06608. We find that about 40-45% of the points excluded by ATLAS escape the currently available simplified model constraints. For these points we identify the most relevant topologies which are not tested by the current simplified model results. In particular, we find that topologies with asymmetric branches, including 3-jet signatures from gluino-squark associated production, could be important for improving the current constraining power of simplified models results. Furthermore, for a better coverage of light stops and sbottoms, constraints for decays via heavier neutralinos and charginos, which subsequently decay visibly to the lightest neutralino are also needed.
fields
hep-ph 1years
2025 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
On the coverage of electroweak-inos within the pMSSM with SModelS -- a comparison with the ATLAS pMSSM study
SModelS v3.0 largely reproduces ATLAS pMSSM electroweak-ino constraints, with CMS inclusion and combinations tightening limits but leaving some light ino parameter space viable.