Claimed first large-scale egocentric and multi-view dataset of human-object-human assistance (11.4 hours, 1.2M frames) with three benchmarks; only the abstract was assessable because the submitted body text is a different paper.
CG-HOI: Contact-Guided 3D Human-Object Interaction Generation
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
We propose CG-HOI, the first method to address the task of generating dynamic 3D human-object interactions (HOIs) from text. We model the motion of both human and object in an interdependent fashion, as semantically rich human motion rarely happens in isolation without any interactions. Our key insight is that explicitly modeling contact between the human body surface and object geometry can be used as strong proxy guidance, both during training and inference. Using this guidance to bridge human and object motion enables generating more realistic and physically plausible interaction sequences, where the human body and corresponding object move in a coherent manner. Our method first learns to model human motion, object motion, and contact in a joint diffusion process, inter-correlated through cross-attention. We then leverage this learned contact for guidance during inference to synthesize realistic and coherent HOIs. Extensive evaluation shows that our joint contact-based human-object interaction approach generates realistic and physically plausible sequences, and we show two applications highlighting the capabilities of our method. Conditioned on a given object trajectory, we can generate the corresponding human motion without re-training, demonstrating strong human-object interdependency learning. Our approach is also flexible, and can be applied to static real-world 3D scene scans.
fields
cs.CV 1years
2025 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Perceiving and Acting in First-Person: A Dataset and Benchmark for Egocentric Human-Object-Human Interactions
Claimed first large-scale egocentric and multi-view dataset of human-object-human assistance (11.4 hours, 1.2M frames) with three benchmarks; only the abstract was assessable because the submitted body text is a different paper.