A RAND team turned a 64-paper literature review into a preliminary best-practice checklist for rigorously evaluating general-purpose AI models.
What Makes an Evaluation Useful? Common Pitfalls and Best Practices
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Following the rapid increase in Artificial Intelligence (AI) capabilities in recent years, the AI community has voiced concerns regarding possible safety risks. To support decision-making on the safe use and development of AI systems, there is a growing need for high-quality evaluations of dangerous model capabilities. While several attempts to provide such evaluations have been made, a clear definition of what constitutes a "good evaluation" has yet to be agreed upon. In this practitioners' perspective paper, we present a set of best practices for safety evaluations, drawing on prior work in model evaluation and illustrated through cybersecurity examples. We first discuss the steps of the initial thought process, which connects threat modeling to evaluation design. Then, we provide the characteristics and parameters that make an evaluation useful. Finally, we address additional considerations as we move from building specific evaluations to building a full and comprehensive evaluation suite.
fields
cs.CY 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Preliminary suggestions for rigorous GPAI model evaluations
A RAND team turned a 64-paper literature review into a preliminary best-practice checklist for rigorously evaluating general-purpose AI models.