A comparative benchmark of four Java DSU approaches shows that JVM-level approaches support more complex updates at higher steady-state cost, while agent/DAOP approaches are cheaper but more limited.
Title resolution pending
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.SE 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Dynamic Software Updating in Java -- Comparing Concepts and Resource Demands
A comparative benchmark of four Java DSU approaches shows that JVM-level approaches support more complex updates at higher steady-state cost, while agent/DAOP approaches are cheaper but more limited.